1.4. Sonic Traces: Analysis and Sound Recordings in Comparative Musicology

DOI : 10.34847/nkl.408cygsi Publique
Auteur : Lennart Ritz

In my presentation I will deal with the history of music analysis in comparative musicology. With establishing the Berlin Phonogram-Archive and processing their wax cylinder recordings from all over the world, a group of researchers around Erich Moritz v. Hornbostel, Georg Herzog, Mieczyslaw Kolinski and others institutionalized the academic engagement with the musics of the world under the brand ...of “comparative musicology” in beginning of the 20th century in Germany. The analytical practices of Hornbostel et al. follow a positivistic and universalistic approach in line with contemporary evolutionary paradigms of anthropology, as they focused on transcriptions, tonal and frequency measurements, and large-scale comparisons of archived phonograph recordings. I will argue that with those practices of recording, archiving, dissecting, and comparing, recorded sound was utilized as sonic trace against the backdrop of Ginzburgian conjectural paradigm (Ginzburg 1989). In accord with medical semiotics the engagement with sound recordings as sonic traces enabled comparative musicology to establish specific listening practices as “privileged technique[s] of empirical examination” that made the “truth” about the musics of the world “audible” (Sterne 2003, p. 122) while the colonial entanglements of these recordings as well as their local ontologies were overlooked or ignored. I will introduce and discuss those practices in detail in regard to the following questions: What can we learn from revisiting those scientific practices regarding current analytical and archival practices in ethno-musicology? What taken for granted epistemologies of recorded sound are still at play these days?

Fichier  
Visualisation

ID : 10.34847/nkl.408cygsi/fdd09c0ba2ad69545198312162b637bf5b4ea27a

Url d'intégration : https://api.nakala.fr/embed/10.34847/nkl.408cygsi/fdd09c0ba2ad69545198312162b637bf5b4ea27a

Url de téléchargement : https://api.nakala.fr/data/10.34847/nkl.408cygsi/fdd09c0ba2ad69545198312162b637bf5b4ea27a

Citer
Partager
Déposée par Adam Filaber le 23/06/2023
nakala:title Anglais 1.4. Sonic Traces: Analysis and Sound Recordings in Comparative Musicology
nakala:creator Lennart Ritz
nakala:created 2023-03-29
nakala:type dcterms:URI Vidéo
nakala:license Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0)
dcterms:description Anglais In my presentation I will deal with the history of music analysis in comparative musicology. With establishing the Berlin Phonogram-Archive and processing their wax cylinder recordings from all over the world, a group of researchers around Erich Moritz v. Hornbostel, Georg Herzog, Mieczyslaw Kolinski and others institutionalized the academic engagement with the musics of the world under the brand of “comparative musicology” in beginning of the 20th century in Germany. The analytical practices of Hornbostel et al. follow a positivistic and universalistic approach in line with contemporary evolutionary paradigms of anthropology, as they focused on transcriptions, tonal and frequency measurements, and large-scale comparisons of archived phonograph recordings. I will argue that with those practices of recording, archiving, dissecting, and comparing, recorded sound was utilized as sonic trace against the backdrop of Ginzburgian conjectural paradigm (Ginzburg 1989). In accord with medical semiotics the engagement with sound recordings as sonic traces enabled comparative musicology to establish specific listening practices as “privileged technique[s] of empirical examination” that made the “truth” about the musics of the world “audible” (Sterne 2003, p. 122) while the colonial entanglements of these recordings as well as their local ontologies were overlooked or ignored. I will introduce and discuss those practices in detail in regard to the following questions: What can we learn from revisiting those scientific practices regarding current analytical and archival practices in ethno-musicology? What taken for granted epistemologies of recorded sound are still at play these days?
dcterms:language anglais